Tuesday, August 27, 2013

A630.3.3.RB_HansardCarey

After watching the Southwest Airlines culture committee video, I am not entirely convinced that they have established a norm. According to Brown (2011), norms are, “ organized and shared ideas regarding what members should do and feel, and how this behavior should be regulated” (p. 10). In the video, the surprise cleanings did seem to be organized; however, the piece that left me doubtful that this was a norm was the fact that one of the flight attendants and member of the committee that they interviewed said that most of the flight attendants didn’t even know that Southwest did something like this. If it is in fact a norm, then shouldn’t the employees at least know about it? They may not have ever been the recipient of the committee’s kindness but they should at least know that there are groups of people in the organization trying to make someone else’s day better. Rather than establishing norms, the culture committee seems more to me like they are the deliverers of random rewards (which can be nice, too).

When I finished watching the video, other Southwest videos appeared in the margins of the You Tube page and I decided to watch another, A Day in the Life of a New Hire at Southwest. I thought that this was a better depiction of the way Southwest goes about establishing norms. The new hires are led through several processes, as they would be at many companies. The difference was that the new hires are grouped together and led through what Travis Peterson, Senior Manager of People, describes the enculturation process. He attributes this enculturation (or socialization according to Brown, 2011) to Southwest’s low turnover rate of about 5%. New employees listen to members of Southwest’s upper management talk about the airline and its culture. They are also treated to a fun day of karaoke and games. I think that this sets the stage for a fun culture in the organization. Please watch this video as an example of the fun atmosphere at Southwest.

The culture committee is an attempt to let the employees know that they are appreciated. In order to do this, other employees do something nice for their counterparts. Although I believe that the recipients appreciate these random acts of kindness, I would also be interested to know what the organization does for its employees to let them know they are appreciated. An organization’s culture is a combination of many factors including the attitudes and sentiments of management, the technology used by the organization, job descriptions, and the hierarchy of an organization all make up the culture (Brown, 2011). I did not get the sense that members of management were included in what we saw on the video nor did I hear any evidence to indicate that any of the other factors that establish a culture were included. I certainly think that what the culture committee is doing should be continued. People like to be appreciated whether it is by their customers, peers, or supervisors.

In my organization, the human resources department has organized the WEQC, a committee that organizes events for employees throughout the year in order to show appreciation for employees’ hard work. Events such as a health and wellness fair, Bring Your Child to Work day, and the school supply drive for employees’ children are examples of affairs hat the committee plans. The events are organized for large groups of employees and many only apply to certain groups; for instance, the “meet Santa” event is for those employees who have smaller children. Coming from a public school system where there is almost no recognition of employees, this has been a refreshing change and has turned into a peripheral norm for the organization. It would be nice if the committee could do more. Recognizing employees of the quarter might be nice and it would also be nice if a member of each department could be on the committee to provide a variety of ideas to recognize and appreciate employees in each area of the organization.

According to Williams (2013), in organizations with cultures that promote mentorship of new employees the new hires, “produce higher quality work than corporate cultures that encourage competition and duplicity among employees”. What this tells me is that corporations that have employees who feel a sense of belonging and being included in the culture from the very beginning of their employment will get the most out of their people. I do not currently have responsibility for this process; however, in November, a new person was hired for the training team and it was my responsibility to show her the ropes, so to speak. It was important to me to introduce her to as many people as I could and explain to her the reasoning behind many of our processes. She felt included in the organization and was impressed by how friendly and helpful everyone had been. Conversely, when I started several years ago, the trainer at the time was a teleworker. Although HR has a process for supervisors to follow with respect to new hires, my former supervisor left the majority of my acclimation into the environment and culture up to the other trainer. However, since she was not physically present, there were many gaps in this process including the fact that she had little to do with the team culture because she was not there and therefore, could not help me understand what that culture was like. She was not helpful to me and I felt ignored and isolated, not how I wanted to feel after leaving my previous job of 18 years. My goal for the future is to make people feel important, informed, and a part of what we do at our organization. The processes that we use to make that happen can vary but I think that having a team like Southwest does that is in charge of determining what that process looks like is important. Once they establish the process, the entire organization should be trained on what to do so that people have similar experiences and start their careers with us on a positive note.

References:
Brown, D. R. (2011). An experiential approach to organization development. (8th ed. ed.). Boston: Prentice Hall.


Williams, R. B. (2013, May 14). How "giving" can create a positive organizational culture. Psychology today, Retrieved from http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/wired-success/201305/how-giving-can-create-positive-organizational-culture




Thursday, August 22, 2013

A630.2.4.RB_HansardCarey

In history, the period called the Enlightenment happened between the 17th and 18th centuries. It was a period that was characterized by dramatic changes in thought in many areas including politics and science (Bristow, 2011). These changes were brought about by a different mindset that pushed freedom and allowed people to begin considering other points of view and schools of thought. According to Matthew Taylor, 21st century enlightenment has to do with the idea that in order to live differently, we must have a different mindset. This makes a lot of sense because, as long as we keep handling situations the same way, associating with the same people, and closing our minds to new ideas, nothing will change in our lives. In effect, we are the masters of our own destinies. If we are willing to see issues from other points of view, we can exact change in our lives and our communities.
Taylor (2010) goes on to talk about the fact that people naturally want to change what is unfamiliar to them. This has been seen throughout the years as evidenced by historical events like Europeans trying to convert the native peoples to Christianity. This idea is also a major reason for racism and other forms of hate. We tend to be afraid of that which we do not understand. In my organization, I find people to be more forward thinking and accepting of new concepts. We tend to embrace the unfamiliar as the nature of our business involves keeping up with whatever is trending in the industry. For instance, MOOCs or Massive Open Online Courses, was in its fledgling stages just a couple of years ago. Just this week, Embry-Riddle offered its first MOOC, drawing over 400 interested students.  Although this was not an avenue that the university had pursued in the past, key players within the organizations saw the value and were willing to find out more about what they were and how to make them happen.
Taylor (2010) argues that we should shun pop culture that puts people down and instead concentrate on what will make us more empathetic. This is an extremely difficult task. It is like telling a lifelong smoker to quit cold turkey or a morbidly obese individual to los 200 lbs. Although these requests are not out of the question they certainly are not going to be easy to accomplish. Because pop culture surrounds us, it is easy to get sucked in whether we want to or not. Examples abound however, one in particular stands out to me: reality television shows. There seems to be a trend to put hidden cameras around and record people in unfamiliar or embarrassing situations. I refuse to watch these kinds of shows for many reasons, among them the fact that there is nothing intellectually stimulating about them and most of the time, I end up feeling sorry for the people on t.v. So, although it is possible, I would venture to say that improbable is a better adjective to describe the likelihood of people adopting this mindset.
In my organization, collaboration is a vital part of our culture. In order to bring new technologies on board, we have to work together. IT has to evaluate its support of the product, the faculty have to embrace this technology, trainers have to teach people how to use it, and ultimately, the students have to incorporate it into their classes. If we were to work as fragmented parts, each independent of the other, implementation of new technologies would become much more difficult and frustrating for all involved. Collaboration allow for the sharing of ideas and incorporates many points-of-view. Most organizations rely on some type of collaboration but I think that Embry-Riddle is a shining example of how collaboration (throughout many departments) promotes growth and success.
For me, the phrase that really stood out to me in this assignment was, “to live differently, you have to think differently” (Taylor, 2010).  While I am not opposed to change and growth, my personality type prefers a stable, predictable environment. For instance, when going out for lunch or dinner, I tend to frequent the same places and I order the same things in those places. On the other hand, if I do not change my way of thinking and try a different place, I might miss out on some great food or interesting experiences. Another example of this would be my move to Embry-Riddle a couple of years ago. I had been unhappy in the public school environment for many years but I was scared to make a change. After talking to a close friend I realized that if I continued to be scared, my life would never change. When I finally decided to make the jump to ERAU, not only did I feel relieved, but I also opened up an entirely new world of ideas, innovation, and opportunities for myself. So, as I move forward in my career, I will keep that quote in mind. If I want change, I have to be willing to change the way I think, too. As a leader, the question that occurs to me is, how do you make other people realize this, too? Half the battle is getting people to see the need for change. I think that passion and charisma have a lot to do with this process and hope to be that kind of leader, formally or informally, for someone else in my life like my friend did for me. 
References:
Bristow, William, "Enlightenment", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2011 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2011/entries/enlightenment/.
Taylor, M. (Performer). (2010, August 19). RSA Animate - 21st Century Enlightenment [Web Video]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AC7ANGMy0yo&feature=youtu.be



Friday, August 16, 2013

A630.1.4.RB_HansardCarey

Change is difficult. I do not care who you are or if you know about it ahead of time it is just as hard; however, it is an essential part of life and the evolution of an organization. Charles Darwin said, “It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is the most adaptable to change”. To me, this means that you do not have to be the biggest or even the best but you do have to be flexible. If you do not recognize the trends within your business and stick with the status quo, you will be left behind and eventually fail while those in your field who remain flexible and open to change move forward.
The representation in the video this week reminds me of the recent EagleVision upgrade that took place this past March. We had been using a desktop client (software installed on your computer) but the future of the product was moving to a web based application. Therefore, a lot of time was spent testing the proposed environment. Initially, many were on board for the change. However, after many months of testing, there were several issues noted and many, including myself, were ready to scrap the idea for change. Our CTO, however, had a different vision. My teammates had become pessimistic and doubted the need for and ability to promote this change. The CTO continued to fight for the change and the vision that she had for an improved EagleVision environment. She combined her vision and power with many of the Organization Development (unknowingly) techniques to lead the crowd over the hurdle so that the upgrade could occur. She, along with other members of our team, developed a plan for the change that included working closely with the vendor to figure out why there were so many issues. Her collaborative approach involved the vendor, the training team, IT Support, and leadership and focused on the improved performance of the new environment and how it would affect the quality of our EagleVision sessions for students and instructors. Bringing different systems together allowed us to understand that the issues were solvable if we opened the lines of communication with the vendor. From that point on, (as in the video) there was a crowd following her to the other side, so to speak. Once the upgrade happened, we still had many faculty and staff left in the past begging for the old environment to return but most of us were cheering on the other side coaxing the others across.  
Change starts with one person believing it can happen. Just as difficult as the change itself is, convincing others that change is good and beneficial is just as challenging. The right leader possesses the traits and skills that keep the crowds believing and following. Luckily, we have that type of leader in WW Technology Services.

References:
Brown, D. R. (2011). An experiential approach to organization development. (8th ed. ed.). Boston: Prentice Hall.

Kohn, S. (Producer). (2007, 11 07). A Tale of Power & Vision [Web Video]. Retrieved from 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZVIWZGheXY